The Supreme Court on Wednesday announced that it will hear oral arguments in January on a request from the Trump administration to allow the president to fire Lisa Cook, a […] ...

Berk v. Choy, to be argued on Oct. 6, surely will be the Supreme Court case of the year for medical professionals. At issue in the case is the extent […] ...

On Oct. 6 in Villarreal v. Texas, the court will consider whether a trial court may prevent a criminal defense lawyer from talking to his client about the client’s ongoing […] ...

Welcome to October! You may associate the month with pumpkin spice and Halloween, but, to SCOTUSblog, October will always mean the court is back in session. Morning Reads SCOTUS Quick […] ...

Issues: (1) Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation ...

As the justices make their final preparations this week for the start of the 2025-26 term, they’ll also address the latest request for a stay of execution. Victor Tony […] ...

Issue: Whether, when an arbitration agreement contains a provision delegating to the arbitrator gateway questions of arbitrability, a court must leave for the arbitrator to decide the issue of whether ...

Issue: Whether the court should summarily vacate the court of appeals’ judgment under United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., and remand with instructions to dismiss the case. Date Proceedings and Orders ...

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s investiture ceremony took place on this day in 2022, but she actually had been serving on the court for three months by that point after taking […] ...

Application (24A1048) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 11, 2025. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including ...

Issue: Whether a state may exercise criminal jurisdiction over an Indian for conduct in Indian country absent a valid congressional grant of authority.

Issue: Whether a State or local official who moves to terminate prospective relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (b) (1) (A) bears any affirmative burden beyond demonstrating that the requisite amount of ...