On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho issued a ruling granting a temporary restraining order (TRO) in ...

The ACLU of Idaho and others are suing to block a new state law that would limit public benefits for undocumented immigrants.

The opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas finds that requiring people to confirm they’re 18 or older to view sexually ...

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that could have broad implications for online free speech. The court ruled 6-3 in ...

The latter case he referred to is Reno v. ACLU, a 1997 decision that determined prohibiting "indecent" online speech violated the First Amendment.

Despite past cases that upheld government regulation of obscene material on radio and television, the Supreme Court held in Reno v. ACLU that regulation of speech on the internet deserved strict ...

The case could hinge on the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, which held that the government cannot protect minors by broadly suppressing speech directed ...

The 5-4 opinion drew on a prior case known as Reno v. ACLU. It was a 1997 case regarding two parts of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which was an earlier law with a similar aim as child ...

The 5-4 opinion drew on a prior case known as Reno v. ACLU. It was a 1997 case regarding two parts of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which was an earlier law with a similar aim as COPA. There ...

The reason why is obvious to most Internet Law scholars: over two decades ago, at the dawn of the Internet age, a pair of Supreme Court cases, Reno v. ACLU and Ashcroft v.

The most significant legal case in the history of the Internet is the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Reno v.American Civil Liberties Union, which held that a federal law against online ...

ACLU lawyers argued that Nevada's limitations on Medicaid abortion coverage violates the ERA, because the restrictions disproportionately discriminate against poor people and people of color.