When the justices rule without offering a rationale, we can't know if they are following the law or just exercising power.

Lawyers for North Dakota on Tuesday urged the court to leave in place a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th ...

Trump celebrated when the Supreme Court limited nationwide blocks on his policies, but judges are finding other ways to ...

The Black civil rights movement’s greatest legal achievement is now on a Republican Supreme Court’s chopping block.

The Supreme Court cleared the way for mass Education Department layoffs, bolstering President Donald Trump’s federal ...

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is moving ahead with a plan to cut 10,000 jobs after the Supreme Court ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a lower court order that blocked sweeping layoffs of federal workers at nearly two dozen ...

SCOTUS allowed President Trump’s federal workforce cuts to proceed temporarily, pausing a lower court block while legal ...

In Dissent is a recurring series by Anastasia Boden on Supreme Court dissents that have shaped (or reshaped) our country. Please note that the views of outside contributors do not reflect […] ...

Playing a guessing game with the opinions and reasonings of Supreme Court Justices does a disservice to the rule of law ...

The courts continue to be the only bulwark against an overreaching executive, writes Nancy Gertner, a former U.S. District ...

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to allow President Donald Trump’s administration to move forward with his plan to thin out ...