The judicial insurrection can still block President Trump's policies in the courts, despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. CASA.

While not definitive, the decision signals the justices’ inclination to see religious parents succeed in their two-year legal ...

"It’s hard not to feel a chill down your back when you imagine all of the possibilities that could come out of this case." ...

The effect of this opinion will be to alert government agencies that parents’ constitutional rights to direct the religious ...

The American Civil Liberties Union shrugs off warnings from the high bench and files for a chance to try a class action suit ...

Deadline: White House” legal analyst Jordan Rubin answers your questions about the Supreme Court, Trump administration ...

Thomas and Alito had the majority in only 62% of non-unanimous cases.

Alito had to contort the meaning of canonical Supreme Court doctrine so that he could either ignore established precedent or ...

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that parents have a right to withdraw their children from public school classes when ...

Litigation involving “transition-related medical procedures and medications” in the State Health Plan of North Carolina has been sent back to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of ...

The Supreme Court has told Maryland parents their children do not have to sit through militant LGBTQ+ indoctrination classes, ...

The Supreme Court on Monday tossed aside a handful of lower court rulings that sided with transgender Americans, requiring ...