On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho issued a ruling granting a temporary restraining order (TRO) in ...

The ACLU of Idaho and others are suing to block a new state law that would limit public benefits for undocumented immigrants.

The opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas finds that requiring people to confirm they’re 18 or older to view sexually ...

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that could have broad implications for online free speech. The court ruled 6-3 in ...

The Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) announced on Tuesday it has reached an agreement with the Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Roger Williams University ...

The latter case he referred to is Reno v. ACLU, a 1997 decision that determined prohibiting "indecent" online speech violated the First Amendment.

The court heard oral arguments Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton. The “Free Speech Coalition” is a coalition of pornographers including Pornhub.

Paxton, could pave the way for even broader adoption of such measures across the country. A test of precedent The case could hinge on the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Reno v.

The 5-4 opinion drew on a prior case known as Reno v. ACLU. It was a 1997 case regarding two parts of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which was an earlier law with a similar aim as child ...

The 5-4 opinion drew on a prior case known as Reno v. ACLU. It was a 1997 case regarding two parts of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which was an earlier law with a similar aim as COPA. There ...

The reason why is obvious to most Internet Law scholars: over two decades ago, at the dawn of the Internet age, a pair of Supreme Court cases, Reno v. ACLU and Ashcroft v.

The most significant legal case in the history of the Internet is the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, which held that a federal law against online ...